<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TwoThirds.USTwoThirds.US</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twothirds.us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twothirds.us</link>
	<description>Getting Along Long Enough to Get Things Done</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:15:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>States Move to Nullify National Defense Authorization Act-Virginia</title>
		<link>http://twothirds.us/ndaa-v/</link>
		<comments>http://twothirds.us/ndaa-v/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Custodian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[State's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The U.S. Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twothirds.us/?p=1131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HOUSE BILL NO. 1160 AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE (Proposed by the Governor on April 9, 2012) (Patron Prior to Substitute--Delegate Marshall, R.G.) A BILL to prevent any agency, political subdivision, employee, or member of the military of &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://twothirds.us/ndaa-v/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://twothirds.us/ndaa-v/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>States Move to Nullify National Defense Authorization Act &#8211; Arizona</title>
		<link>http://twothirds.us/ndaa-az/</link>
		<comments>http://twothirds.us/ndaa-az/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Custodian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[State's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The U.S. Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twothirds.us/?p=1148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona: Section 1. Title 41, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding chapter 51, to read: CHAPTER 51 GOVERNMENTAL COMPLIANCE WITH THE NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2012 ARTICLE 1. &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://twothirds.us/ndaa-az/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://twothirds.us/ndaa-az/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>They call it “Supreme” for a reason.</title>
		<link>http://twothirds.us/supreme-reaso/</link>
		<comments>http://twothirds.us/supreme-reaso/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 16:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Custodian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The U.S. Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twothirds.us/?p=1121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our Supreme Court exists to prevent Constitutional violations, period. It does not matter whether these violations are the result of duly ratified legislation, lower court decisions, Presidential orders, departmental regulations, State laws, or even previous Supreme Court rulings. Activist and &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://twothirds.us/supreme-reaso/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://twothirds.us/supreme-reaso/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welfare 1949: The More Things Change &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://twothirds.us/welfare-1949/</link>
		<comments>http://twothirds.us/welfare-1949/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 18:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Custodian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twothirds.us/?p=1110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Year -- 1949 -- Situation: The Same -- Lessons Learned: None The only thing that I can even begin to say about this "Ode to the Welfare State" is that it provides additional proof that the problem is not with &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://twothirds.us/welfare-1949/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://twothirds.us/welfare-1949/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Learning From History (or not)</title>
		<link>http://twothirds.us/history1-1/</link>
		<comments>http://twothirds.us/history1-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Custodian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twothirds.us/?p=1092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Year: 1946 -- Situation: The Same -- Lessons Learned: None Proving that the more things change, the more they remain the same. I was perusing a friend's collection of 'old' magazines (Thank You Ardie) and discovered this gem From the &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://twothirds.us/history1-1/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://twothirds.us/history1-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health Care Mandate &#8211; A Foot in the Door?</title>
		<link>http://twothirds.us/hc-mandate/</link>
		<comments>http://twothirds.us/hc-mandate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Custodian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obamacare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twothirds.us/?p=1009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even if you believe that government mandated health care insurance is a good idea, or if the supreme court decides that the purchase of insurance for health care, (which is not a constitutionally enumerated right) can be legally forced upon &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://twothirds.us/hc-mandate/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://twothirds.us/hc-mandate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Incandescent Bulbs Were Invented Today&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://twothirds.us/bulb-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://twothirds.us/bulb-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 13:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Custodian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Independence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twothirds.us/?p=982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What if, in a strange alternate universe, the incandescent bulb was invented today, and the CFL had been invented first?
Imagine the news.

"New, ultra bright light bulb contains no pollutants" <a class="more-link" href="http://twothirds.us/bulb-ban/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://twothirds.us/bulb-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voter I.D., Minorities, Racism and Fraud</title>
		<link>http://twothirds.us/voter-id/</link>
		<comments>http://twothirds.us/voter-id/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Eggleston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The U.S. Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twothirds.us/?p=901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To co-opt another person’s vote, merely get to the polls before they do, and give that person's name and address rather than yours to the nice, helpful person at the table. If you need help finding a voter's information, please &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://twothirds.us/voter-id/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://twothirds.us/voter-id/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Firearm Carry Permit Recognition – Is it a Smoke Screen?</title>
		<link>http://twothirds.us/permit-smoke-screen/</link>
		<comments>http://twothirds.us/permit-smoke-screen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Custodian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Commentary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twothirds.us/?p=856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Legislation recently in the works would require all states to recognize other state's concealed firearms permits and licenses. (With the notable exceptions of DC and Illinois) At first blush, one would think that persons holding concealed firearms permits, the NRA, &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://twothirds.us/permit-smoke-screen/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://twothirds.us/permit-smoke-screen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shouldn&#8217;t an Oath Mean Something?</title>
		<link>http://twothirds.us/an-oath/</link>
		<comments>http://twothirds.us/an-oath/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Custodian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The U.S. Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twothirds.us/?p=775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proposed Change to the Oath of Office I'd leave the oaths of office for Civilian Employees and the Military alone for the moment. I do, however, have one minor change to suggest for the President, Congress, Judges and high-level appointees. &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://twothirds.us/an-oath/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://twothirds.us/an-oath/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

